15-Month Health Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients from Onset: A Cohort Study (preprint)

Background: The long-term impact of COVID-19 on patient health has been a recent focus. This study aims to determine the persistent symptoms and psychological conditions of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 15 months after onset. The potential risk factors were also explored.Methods: A cohort of COVID-19 patients discharged from February 20, 2020 to March 31, 2020 was recruited. Follow-ups were conducted using validated questionnaires and psychological screening scales at 15 months after onset to evaluate the patients’ health status. The risk factors for long-term health impacts and their associations with disease severity was analyzed.Findings: 534 COVID-19 patients were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 62.0 years old (IQR 52.0-70.0) and 295 were female (55.2%). The median time from onset to follow-up was 460.0 (451.0-467.0) days. Sleep disturbance (18.5%, 99/534) and fatigue (17.2%, 92/534) were the most common persistent symptoms. 6.4% (34/534) of the patients had depression, 9.2% (49/534) were anxious, 13.0% (70/534) had insomnia and 4.7% (25/534) suffered from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Multivariate adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that glucocorticoid use during hospitalization (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.12-11.44) was significantly associated with an increased risk of fatigue. The OR values for anxiety and sleep disorders were 2.36 (95% CI 1.07-5.20) and 2.16 (95% CI 1.13-4.14) in females compared with males. The OR value of PTSD was 25.6 (95% CI 3.3-198.4) in patients with persistent symptoms to those without persistent symptoms. No significant associations were observed between fatigue syndrome or adverse mental outcomes and disease severity.Interpretation: 15-month follow-up in this study aroused the need of extended rehabilitation intervention for complete recovery in COVID-19 patients. Funding: None to declare. Declaration of Interest: All the authors declare no competing interests.Ethical Approval: The Research Ethics Committee of Shanghai Changzheng Hospital approved this study (2020SL007).

Treatment with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for COVID-19 patients with lung damage: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled phase 2 trial (preprint)

Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) for severe COVID-19 patients with lung damage. Design, Multicentre , randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting Two hospitals in Wuhan, China, 5 March 2020 to 28 March 2020. Participants 101 severe COVID-19 patients with lung damage aged between 18-74 years. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive either UC-MSCs (40 million cells per infusion) or placebo on days 0, 3, and 6. Main outcome measures The primary endpoints were safety and an altered proportion of whole lung lesion size from baseline to day 28, measured by chest computed tomography. Secondary outcomes were reduction of consolidation lesion sizeand lung function improvement (6-minute walk test, maximum vital capacity, diffusing capacity). Primary analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population and safety analysis was done in all patients who started their assigned treatment. Results 100 patients were finally recruited to receive either UC-MSCs (n = 65) or placebo (n = 35). The patients receiving UC-MSCs exhibited a trend of numerical improvement in whole lung lesion size from baseline to day 28 compared with the placebo cases (the median difference was -13.31%, 95%CI -29.14%, 2.13%, P=0.080). UC-MSCs administration significantly reduced the proportions of consolidation lesion size from baseline to day 28 compared with the placebo (median difference: -15.45%, 95% CI -30.82%, -0.39%, P=0.043). The 6-minute walk test showed an increased distance in patients treated with UC-MSCs (difference: 27.00 m, 95% CI 0.00, 57.00, P=0.057). The incidence of adverse events was similar, and no serious adverse events were observed in the two groups. Conclusions UC-MSCs treatment is a safe and potentially effective therapeutic approach for COVID-19 patients with lung damage. A phase 3 trial is required to evaluate effects on reducing mortality and preventing long-term pulmonary disability.

Treatment with Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Severe COVID-19 Patients with Lung Damage: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo‑Controlled Phase 2 Trial (preprint)

Background: Treatment of severe Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is challenging. We performed a phase 2 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of human umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells (UC‑MSCs) to treat patients with severe COVID-19 with lung damage, based on our phase 1 data.Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial, we recruited 101 eligible patients with severe COVID-19 with lung damage aged between 18–74 years from two hospitals. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to receive either UC-MSCs (4 × 107 cells per infusion) or placebo on day 0, 3, and 6. We excluded patients with malignant tumours, shock, or other organ failure. The primary endpoint was an altered proportion of whole lung lesion areas from baseline to day 28, measured by chest computed tomography. Other imaging outcomes, 6-minute walk test, maximum vital capacity, diffusing capacity, plasma biomarkers, and adverse events were recorded and analysed. Primary analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population and safety analysis was done in all patients who started their assigned treatment. Findings: From March 5, 2020, to March 28, 2020, 100 patients were finally enrolled and received either UC-MSCs (n = 65) or placebo (n = 35). During follow-up, the patients receiving UC-MSCs exhibited a trend of numerical improvement in whole lung lesions from baseline to day 28 compared with the placebo cases. UC-MSCs administration significantly reduced the proportions of consolidation lesions from baseline to day 28 in the treated patients compared with the placebo subjects. The 6-minute walk test showed an increased distance in patients treated with UC-MSCs. Notably, UC-MSCs delivery was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.Interpretation: UC-MSCs treatment is a safe and potentially effective therapeutic approach for patients with severe COVID‑19. The trial suggests that UC-MSCs administration might benefit patients with COVID-19 with lung damage at the convalescent stage as well as the progression stage.Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04288102.Funding Statement: This trial was supported by The National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFC0841900, 2020YFC0844000, 2020YFC08860900); The Innovation Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81721002); The National Science and Technology Major Project (2017YFA0105703).Declaration of Interests: All authors declare no competing interests.Ethics Approval Statement: Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review boards of each participating hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all the enrolled patients or their legal representatives if they were unable to provide consent.